Review




Structured Review

Proteintech cd206
The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and <t>CD206</t> expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.
Cd206, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1070 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd206/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1070 article reviews
cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Mossy-textured hydroxyapatite-modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres promote collagen regeneration via calcium/TGF-β and chemokine signaling pathways in soft tissue augmentation"

Article Title: Mossy-textured hydroxyapatite-modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres promote collagen regeneration via calcium/TGF-β and chemokine signaling pathways in soft tissue augmentation

Journal: Bioactive Materials

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.028

The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Techniques Used: In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture, Staining, Co-Culture Assay

Evaluation of soft tissue filling and inflammatory response in rats. (A, B) Schematic diagram of the soft tissue filling experiment and injection sites, with at least 2 cm spacing between sites. (C) Photographs of subcutaneous soft tissue filling at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The white circles indicate the soft tissue filling areas. (D) H&E staining of the filled sites. (E, F) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of TNF-α and TGF-β expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). (G, H) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.
Figure Legend Snippet: Evaluation of soft tissue filling and inflammatory response in rats. (A, B) Schematic diagram of the soft tissue filling experiment and injection sites, with at least 2 cm spacing between sites. (C) Photographs of subcutaneous soft tissue filling at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The white circles indicate the soft tissue filling areas. (D) H&E staining of the filled sites. (E, F) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of TNF-α and TGF-β expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). (G, H) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Techniques Used: Injection, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing



Similar Products

96
Proteintech cd206
The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and <t>CD206</t> expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.
Cd206, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd206/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech cd206 polyclonal antibody
Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD206</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
Cd206 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd206 polyclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd206 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech 18704 1 ap
Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD206</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
18704 1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/18704 1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
18704 1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti cd206
Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD206</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
Anti Cd206, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd206/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech 1 ap
Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of <t>CD206</t> in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).
1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Mossy-textured hydroxyapatite-modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres promote collagen regeneration via calcium/TGF-β and chemokine signaling pathways in soft tissue augmentation

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.028

Figure Lengend Snippet: The regulatory effects of CaHA/PLGA microspheres on macrophages and ADSCs in vitro. (A, B) CLSM images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with microspheres for 2 days (n = 3). (C–F) Relative mRNA expression levels of inflammation-related genes TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β1, and FGF-2 in RAW264.7 cells (n = 3). (G, H) Sirius red staining images and quantitative analysis (n = 3) of collagen deposition of ADSCs co-cultured with CaHA/PLGA microspheres for 3 and 7 days. (I–K) Relative mRNA expression levels of TGF-β1, FGF-2, and PDGF-A in ADSCs after 3 and 7 days of co-culture with CaHA/PLGA microspheres (n = 3). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Article Snippet: CD86 polyclonal antibody (1:200, 13395-1-AP, Proteintech), CD206 (1:200, 18704-1-AP, Proteintech), and TNF-α recombinant antibody (1:200, 80258-6-RR, Proteintech) were used as primary antibodies, incubated overnight at 4 °C.

Techniques: In Vitro, Expressing, Cell Culture, Staining, Co-Culture Assay

Evaluation of soft tissue filling and inflammatory response in rats. (A, B) Schematic diagram of the soft tissue filling experiment and injection sites, with at least 2 cm spacing between sites. (C) Photographs of subcutaneous soft tissue filling at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The white circles indicate the soft tissue filling areas. (D) H&E staining of the filled sites. (E, F) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of TNF-α and TGF-β expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). (G, H) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Mossy-textured hydroxyapatite-modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres promote collagen regeneration via calcium/TGF-β and chemokine signaling pathways in soft tissue augmentation

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.12.028

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of soft tissue filling and inflammatory response in rats. (A, B) Schematic diagram of the soft tissue filling experiment and injection sites, with at least 2 cm spacing between sites. (C) Photographs of subcutaneous soft tissue filling at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The white circles indicate the soft tissue filling areas. (D) H&E staining of the filled sites. (E, F) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of TNF-α and TGF-β expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). (G, H) Immunofluorescence images and RFI of CD86 and CD206 expression at 2 weeks post-filling (n = 6). ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001; ns , not significant.

Article Snippet: CD86 polyclonal antibody (1:200, 13395-1-AP, Proteintech), CD206 (1:200, 18704-1-AP, Proteintech), and TNF-α recombinant antibody (1:200, 80258-6-RR, Proteintech) were used as primary antibodies, incubated overnight at 4 °C.

Techniques: Injection, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing

Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Immune regulative GelMA&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -whitlockite scaffolds with continuous ions release for bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of immune inflammation (RAW264.7) in the scaffolds. A, B) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD206 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD206 (M2 marker) shown in red (scale bar = 50 μm). C, D) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD86 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD86 (M1 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). E, F) Immunofluorescent staining results and quantitative fluorescence intensity of CD163 in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts, with CD163 (M2 marker) shown in green (scale bar = 50 μm). G) Flow cytometry analysis of CD86 and CD11b positive cells in inflammatory RAW264.7 cells. H) Fluorescence enzyme labeling for the quantitative analysis of ROS content in macrophages. I) Cell viability of RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts for 1, 3, and 5 days. J) NO content in RAW264.7 cells co-cultured with different sample extracts. K) DCFH-DA fluorescent probe detection to evaluate ROS content in macrophages after stimulation with different sample extracts (scale bar = 100 μm). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

Article Snippet: For CD206, cells were stained using a CD206 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 18704-1-AP, Proteintech, USA) and a Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (1:400, A0521, Beyotime, China), following the same protocol.

Techniques: Staining, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Marker, Flow Cytometry, Labeling

In vivo regulation of the immune microenvironment by GM&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -WH. A) At postoperative weeks 4 and 8, the immunomodulatory function of scaffolds was assessed using IF staining for a) CD86 and b) CD206 (scale bar = 50 μm). B) Semiquantitative analysis of CD86 + /CD206+ at 4 weeks. C) Semiquantitative analysis of CD86 + /CD206+ at 8 weeks. (n = 6). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: Immune regulative GelMA&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -whitlockite scaffolds with continuous ions release for bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo regulation of the immune microenvironment by GM&Zn 2+ /Ce 3+ -WH. A) At postoperative weeks 4 and 8, the immunomodulatory function of scaffolds was assessed using IF staining for a) CD86 and b) CD206 (scale bar = 50 μm). B) Semiquantitative analysis of CD86 + /CD206+ at 4 weeks. C) Semiquantitative analysis of CD86 + /CD206+ at 8 weeks. (n = 6). P values were determined using one-way ANOVA (∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗P < 0.05, N.S., not significant).

Article Snippet: For CD206, cells were stained using a CD206 polyclonal antibody (1:600, 18704-1-AP, Proteintech, USA) and a Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (1:400, A0521, Beyotime, China), following the same protocol.

Techniques: In Vivo, Staining